Web3 Contract Security Analysis: Interpretation of Attack Methods and Prevention Strategies in the First Half of 2022

Analysis of Major Attack Methods and Prevention Strategies in the Web3 Field in the First Half of 2022

In the field of blockchain security, the first half of 2022 presented some noteworthy trends. By analyzing the security incidents during this period, we can gain insights into the common attack methods used by hackers and how to better prevent these threats.

Overview of Losses Due to Vulnerabilities

According to data monitoring, there were a total of 42 major contract vulnerability attack incidents in the first half of 2022, resulting in approximately $644 million in losses. Among all the exploited vulnerabilities, logical or function design flaws were the most common, followed by validation issues and reentrancy vulnerabilities. This indicates that there is still significant room for improvement in security oversight during the contract design and development phases.

"Anonymous" Tactics Analysis: What are the common attack methods used by hackers in Web3 in the first half of 2022?

Analysis of Typical Security Incidents

At the beginning of February, a cross-chain bridge project suffered a massive attack, resulting in losses as high as $326 million. The hackers exploited a signature verification vulnerability in the contract, successfully forging accounts and minting tokens. This highlights the design vulnerabilities of cross-chain projects.

At the end of April, a lending protocol suffered a flash loan attack, resulting in losses exceeding $80 million. The attacker exploited a reentrancy vulnerability in the protocol, ultimately forcing the project to shut down. This incident once again confirms the dangers of reentrancy vulnerabilities and the power of flash loan attacks.

"Anonymous" Tactics Deconstruction: What are the common attack methods used by hackers in Web3 in the first half of 2022?

Common Types of Vulnerabilities

The most common vulnerabilities found during the audit process can be roughly divided into four categories:

  1. Reentrancy attacks related to ERC721/ERC1155 standards
  2. Contract Logic Design Defects
  3. Key features lack permission control
  4. Price Manipulation Vulnerability

Among them, contract logic vulnerabilities are still the most commonly exploited attack vectors by hackers. The good news is that through professional smart contract auditing and formal verification, most of these vulnerabilities can be detected and fixed during the development stage.

"Anonymous" Tactics Breakdown: What are the common attack methods used by hackers in Web3 in the first half of 2022?

"Anonymous" Tactics Breakdown: What are the common attack methods used by hackers in Web3 in the first half of 2022?

"Anonymous" Tactics Analysis: What are the common attack methods used by hackers in Web3 in the first half of 2022?

"Anonymous" Tactics Analysis: What are the common attack methods used by hackers in Web3 in the first half of 2022?

"Anonymous" Tactics Dissection: What are the Common Attack Methods Used by Hackers in Web3 in the First Half of 2022?

"Anonymous" Tactics Breakdown: What are the Common Attack Methods Used by Hackers in Web3 in the First Half of 2022?

"Anonymous" Tactics Breakdown: What are the common attack methods used by hackers in Web3 in the first half of 2022?

Prevention Suggestions

  1. Strictly follow the "check-effect-interaction" design pattern to prevent reentrancy attacks.
  2. Consider special scenarios comprehensively and improve contract function design.
  3. Add strict permission controls for key functions
  4. Use reliable oracles to avoid price manipulation.
  5. Conduct a comprehensive security audit, with a particular focus on logical vulnerabilities.
  6. Stay vigilant and continuously monitor the contract operation status.

In general, with the rapid development of the Web3 ecosystem, security issues remain a major challenge. Project teams need to pay more attention to contract security and comprehensively enhance safety through professional audits and other means. At the same time, the entire industry also needs to continuously summarize experiences and lessons learned to jointly build a more secure and reliable Web3 ecosystem.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Share
Comment
0/400
mev_me_maybevip
· 07-16 09:54
Are there this many vulnerabilities?
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalystvip
· 07-14 15:10
With this level of security, do they still dare to Be Played for Suckers?
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAllvip
· 07-14 15:10
Is 42 attacks serious?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollectorvip
· 07-14 15:06
The verification has problems again, it's really hard to bear.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)